Fraud in Venezuela: Opposition candidate Edmundo González Urrutia Chavista will not attend Supreme Court summons

Venezuelan opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia He confirmed that Chavista will not attend the Supreme Court's summons this Wednesday. “Timely completion based on inspection minutes is not systematically developed Available to participating political organizations and candidates or all audits mandated by current regulations have not been carried out”, said the politician in a letter published on his social media.

“The constitutional and legal powers of the electoral authority have been ignored and flagrantly violated.. The National Electoral Council (CNE) did not carry out its assigned tasks in relation to the electoral process aimed at electing the President of the Republic for the period 2025-2031. The CNE has not yet published the results of the presidential election as required by the constitution and law” González Urrutia began writing.

He further noted: “It is the function of the CNE to guarantee the transparency and credibility of electoral processes, which will only happen once the actual research records become public knowledge. Witnesses from participating political bodies have made available to the nomination that I represent copies of the minutes. They show my victory in the presidential election. A must do Trusted verificationIn the presence of witnesses from political organizations and candidates and national and international audiences.”

Then he pointed out through the media.The said summons has been issued” So appear in person Before the Election Chamber of the Supreme Court to submit election related information and answer questions. “However, If I go before the polling booth, I will do so in completely unsafe conditions. Because the procedure carried out by the Election Commission as reported by the media, Not applicable to any legal process contemplated in the organic law of the Supreme Court or another law within the electoral jurisdiction,” he observed.

“Furthermore, The Electoral Division cannot usurp the constitutional functions of the Electoral Branch and cannot certify decisions which have not yet been prepared in accordance with the Constitution and the law.Participants have access to the original minutes, with appropriate audits to act as a basis for aggregation and declaration. The Election Chamber cannot engage in co-administration of elections with the CNEThe constitution of the Supreme Court is established by law,” he asserted.

In the second part of the letter, the opposition candidate for the presidency of Venezuela wrote, “It is necessary to preserve the principle of separation or separation of powers and to protect the constitutional powers and duties of the CNE.It also avoids distorting the powers of electoral jurisdiction.

“I was invited by the media for an appearance, but to certify the results and to prejudge the alleged criminal liability if a hearing or trial procedure is scheduled before the election chamber to interfere with what kind of procedure? Why are the investigative powers of the exclusive CNE unknown as per the Constitution? What trial do they want to subject me to?” he asked himself.

Finally, he said: “Citizen Nicolás Maduro MorosThe petitioner who filed the alleged appeal before the Electoral Chamber said publicly on August 2, 2024 If I don't appear I will face legal liability and, If I appear and submit copies of inspection minutes, there will be serious criminal liability.. Is it an impartial procedure and respect for due process? ¿I am already forewarned?

“In short, If I go to the polling booth under these conditions, I will be completely vulnerable to insecurity and violation of due process, and I will endanger not only my freedom but, more importantly, the will of the Venezuelan people.Revealed on July 28, 2024 and the great effort of the Venezuelan people who participated in this process, so that we can have evidence that citizens voted validly. I request the authorities to come to their senses and seek ways of direct dialogue that express the views of each party in a constitutionally valid context and in a framework acceptable to all, where human rights are protected and the will of the people is not respected. “My unwavering commitment to the Venezuelan people and to popular sovereignty,” he concluded.