The two lists of Together that will represent the space in November do not reach an agreement –

After knowing the results of the intern in the PASO, two interpretations of the regulation raised a dilemma still without conclusion. The winning alternative ensures that the regulations “are clear” and they do not intend to give up spaces.

The final count of the primaries is one more step on the path that the Juntos front is carrying out at the local level, and it is that far from having completed the internship last Sunday, there are still some differences to be ironed out to know how the list that will present the space in the general elections of November.

Some 500 votes was the difference that the first recount of votes in favor of the ballot led by Sebastián Neuspiller, followed by Adriana Cáceres, had made. However, a closed end showed the good choice made by another of the alternatives, led by Analía Leguizamón accompanied by Flavio Álvarez.

And after recognizing the triumph of the ex-footballer, the dilemma began. It is that of the percentages obtained by both lists, and taking into account that a third option headed by Diego Ranieli did not get the necessary floor to participate in the assembly; the leaders of the two slopes proposed a different interpretation of the party regulations.

While Neuspiller’s ranks maintain that the minority should occupy 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th places, from Leguizamón’s team they assure that the candidate should occupy 2nd place on the list in November.

These days, the tension increases and the agreements seem not to be easy between both sides. And in this vein, Adriana Cáceres, a benchmark on the winning list that seeks not to give in in her position as the second candidate for the Deliberative Council, pointed out on the radio program Agenda Propia, that “Pilarenses supported the list that seeks the political renewal of Juntos en Pillar. We had the clear accompaniment of the Pilarenses and now there are other objectives ahead, such as the unity of space ”.

See also  What time is it on the moon? The space agency wants to define it

Likewise, he remarked that “in an intern, the neighbors decided that they need a political renewal. Now we need unity. There were winners and losers within the intern, and now we have to unite to work for what people need at this time, which is to face a national, provincial and municipal government that is not meeting those needs. “

And while he admitted that the formation of that unit “is a process”, he emphasized that “the loser must accompany. It was our turn to win and I understand that those who lost have to go along. The regulation is clear, when one begins to play the internal one already knew the regulation, and with the defined results, what marks is that the minority must occupy the 3rd and 6th place. That’s clear. There is no other interpretation than that ”.

From the other side, seeking to support the idea of ​​resolving these issues and putting the focus in November, Flavio Álvarez highlighted: There is a regulation that all party forces signed before the elections and that is the agreement that we have. But the law is also interpreted, therefore you can see another look and it is what must be resolved. I am waiting for there to be an agreement and it will be decided by those who have to decide it, but the point is that it has to be decided now, to start working and not be discussing places. This cannot be resolved 20 days before the elections, you have to start working on the agenda and the proposals with the people ”.

See also  Applying mathematical sciences in your home - El Sol de Durango

Myrtle Frost

"Reader. Evil problem solver. Typical analyst. Unapologetic internet ninja."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top